.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Vibesworkshop Blog

Sunday, October 23, 2005

State of the Art- Music

State of the Art - Music
I don't believe in the old concept of a "jazz scene" existing in night clubs and bars any more. I think that is dead in most cities in the US. Most clubs who call themselves jazz clubs are actually "Back-Ground-Music" restaurants or bars who advertise Jazz as a novelty or circus type exhibition similar to the way they hang old plows and harnesses or pictures of the “good ole days” on their walls. So, I've dedicated myself to confronting this problem by trying to invent a new venue for the performance of local art that is dignified and something I can be proud of.

I believe that by piggybacking our performances to the education of music, a perpetual life between the two can be formed. Teaching music can help to financially support our gigs by offering a tangible service of lessons in a venue that can also support concerts when lessons are not in session. As a result of this relationship, the educational facility (or school) will profit by charging students for instruction. Artists profit by having a space to perform concerts in and teach at. The performances help to recruit students for the school and brings potential new blood into the art. This brings back dignity and honor to our performances that once were the primary lure of becoming professionals. Instead of selling pasta and beer, we’re selling tickets to our own concerts (with the help of our students) and teaching our art to others.

Therefore, I believe that the place to focus our attention for live music performance (aka gigs) is not to try and piggyback onto some unrelated business such as restaurants and bars but attach ourselves instead to the teaching of what we do by forming co-ops and schools in our areas that bring local artists and students together, one supporting the other – daytime teaching, with evening concerts.

This could be accomplished perhaps with local art society’s support for forming co-ops that will place it in the hands of the artists but with an organized cooperation… similar to a union or better yet, a “Musician’s Club”. Something like this could also fall into the "not for profit" column and local businesses could help support it by offering small scholarships for students who can't afford the lessons.

On the flip side of that coin, we mustn’t confuse the education of art with what is happening in many of our public and private schools. As a matter of fact, the local schools could be your biggest obstacle.

In the case of Independent School Districts or public schools, the definition of "music" must be carefully scrutinized because most of the public schools are trying (and succeeding) in turning the art form into a competitive sport. This degradation of the art is proudly conceptualized in many of the school band logos, inferring that music is performed primarily on a marching field or in a contest situation. Catering to a mass who typically don’t understand the importance of art on it's on terms has created a second generation of "educators" who are a product of that same system. The band directors who do not embrace the marching/competitive sport concept are usually miserable and won’t last.

This pressure or desire to win contests and put on a great half-time show pressures the administration to hire people who win contests and put on great half-time shows. They then turn the music into something they understand such as marching or regional contests more similar to a track meet than a concert hall. They control all aspects of their student’s lives so that a true music education outside of their control is not possible without lowing the student's grade dramatically. This creates difficult challenges for both the students who wish to learn real music and instructors who are attempting to teach the real art. So often, students who get involved in the band programs at public school eventually find that they belong to a cult-like environment that will never help them learn to play the music they love. I’ve run into many students who believed that they were eventually going to learn music at school or at least learn how to learn music but the only thing they came away learning was bad habits and stick-twirling techniques to win contests.

This is a sad thing, yet in some ways, it is an opportunity for professional artists. As artists, we can spot this weakness in our communities and offer an alternative. Many students and parents are beginning to recognize it too and they are looking for alternatives.

Supporting your local music program is important but you may have to create one first.

8 Comments:

  • The first obstacle I see is defining (or redefining) the value of art in the new millennium. In other words, why should anyone care, because if you can’t convince people why they should care, then you’re just trying to build a mansion in a bed of quicksand.

    I think that one purpose of art – certainly not the only purpose – is to make people think for themselves, whether it’s visual art (finding some personal meaning within a painting) or musical art (finding that personal connection inside a Coltrane solo). But we live in a political climate where people are encouraged not to think for themselves. Piper alludes to this with the implication that students basically trust their band directors to dictate what constitutes “musical value,” what Piper calls “the marching/competitive sport concept.” Students, why think for yourselves when your band director can think for you? Sadly, I think this is the legacy of the last 25 years of continuing marginalization of the arts under the Reagan administration, and I see 2005 as the 25th year of that administration’s continuing agenda.

    If a teaching/concert space is built, are the benefits to be so clearly defined that potential students will actually understand the difference? And I wonder if a stationary facility of any kind simply reinforces the ivory-tower direction jazz has headed since 1980. On the other hand, what if the battle were to be taken to the streets? I like to think that there is a still-relevant example set by the forefathers of jazz: Louis and Duke didn’t worry about such trivia as whether their music as seen as being art – they just got out there and did it. They couldn’t control how people took its artistic value, so they didn’t worry about it. They found a way to transcend their surroundings; if they waited for the surroundings to be right, they would have never accomplished anything. Piper’s conception of a teaching/concert space is certainly a viable step, but one also needs to maintain an awareness of what lies outside of the strict musical box. Artie Shaw said that jazz is essentially a progressive music, and the real challenge is how to be progressive in a repressive political environment.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:03 AM  

  • JMP,

    I appreciate the reply -- I admire that you feel a call to action, and I think any movement at all is a positive one. I'm postulating that there might be multiple approachs that warrant consideration.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:23 PM  

  • Hi Piper,

    Your concept of a "jazz scene" separated from night clubs and bars hits some resonance with what I see going on in the area I live in (Boston MetroWest). Here we have a few not-for-profit arts centers that offer respectful performance opportunities. None of them combine teaching with performing yet, but that might be possible.

    The Amazing Things Arts Center in Framingham (www.amazingthings.org) is the most active -- jazz performances pretty much every weekend and a great jam session every Tuesday night.

    The Center for Arts in Natick (www.natickarts.org) is pretty active too, but maybe a little less of a focus on jazz.

    The Cultural Arts Alliance of Hopkinton (www.caahopkinton.org) doesn't offer many performance opportunities, but does offer music instruction. They also organized a summer concert band this summer.

    Maybe we could create what you're talking about with some sort of alliance here. At any rate, it's an interesting idea to pursue.

    Tom Phelan

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:44 AM  

  • well, ahem, i don't quite agree with all this. jazz IS a music that was about bars and clubs. it WAS folk music in a way. i LOVE playing in clubs even though i complain about it. i LOVE playing while people are eating and hanging out. what a difference from my blog, however i'm very comfortable in a club where people come and are open minded and listening and have a little buzz to them. drugs (alcohol) are a part of the jazz scene. man we all used to get high and listen to rock in the 70's and 80's. for better or for worse that was part of it.

    for me the problem is that people are NOT coming to listen to music, their first reason is to come and drink and socialize. i do play in clubs like chris' jazz cafe where it's more like the way i like it. some noise but a lot of listening. i guess that's where piper's argument comes in, if it's in a school or music store then they ARE COMING to first listen to the music. i get that.

    and i also did a concert with guitarist jimmy bruno in a music store. EVERYBODY there came to hear him, and they were quiet and they didn't request tunes that were stupid and esp out of place. they knew what we were doing and went 'with us'.

    i don't think it's the situation but it's the people and the performers. if people had the time and the interest to open up their minds some more of them would get it and like what we do.

    the world is a funny place now and people are busy and things are very easily accessable and made to order so that's alot harder now adays.

    ok that was a quick 'my take'. i'll probably read it back later and hate what i said.
    we'll see.

    By Blogger Tony, at 9:16 AM  

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger Tony, at 11:59 PM  

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger Tony, at 12:00 AM  

  • I’m in an unusual position in that I teach at a university strictly as an adjunct lecturer (I don’t give lessons), and I also play out several times a week. Half of me entrenched in academia, and the other half aspires to be a street cat (I often have to watch my language in class). So I can see Piper looking towards the future, and I can clearly understand what Tony is saying about the past. Tony’s point is extremely valid without negating Piper’s in any way. Where jazz was born (New Orleans) and the circumstances out of which jazz was borne substantially contribute to making jazz a performance-oriented music (it has to be, if improvisation is a key aesthetic).

    So, my feeling is this – if we wait for people to come to “it,” then I think we’re in for a long, long wait. I witness very limited interest in not only jazz, but also the tradition of American music in general. And Piper alludes to this with his accurate “teaching as sporting event” observations. Right on. And as I interpret Tony, he’s directly taking the music to the streets, because if the public is to be found in restaurants, bars, and joints, then that’s where the battle is to be fought to get the music in front of people. So in that regard, everybody’s is correct; there is no single direction in accomplishing this monumental challenge.

    Although hearing jazz performed at educational facilities was a part of my teenage experience (I actually saw Hendrix in ‘68), the music also found its way to me in the sense that I didn’t have to travel to it – “it” sought me out. True, I agree with Piper that today is different day and age, but I also have to maintain my awareness for what drew me to music initially, and what aspects of that initial enthusiasm still transcend time and space. I think people are basically the same now as then; but the way young people gain their initial awareness and access to music is radically different from days of old (Piper's point, I believe).

    Of course, none of my observations solve the problem as much as I try to encouraging thinking “outside the box,” but I believe that we all agree that a problem does exist and that we’re all on the same page in wanting to change a negative trend into a positive direction.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:00 AM  

  • well, you know what. i think we're all right. play jazz anywhere you want you. just don't talk of it in terms of absolutes.

    speaking of drugs, i played with a trio tonight and they were drunk but they played there butts off. i wasn't drunk, i never get drunk any more, or do drugs. but there's a situation where the band was toasted and they sounded great!!!

    the thing about hendrix is that most of the recordings and most of the concerts he was wasted. most of those guys were wasted back then. so john i'm sure some of the stuff you dig by him was 'under the influence'. i worship hendrix and the drugs were a part of his music. right or wrong. however i do agree that i'm sure there were times where he was so wasted he probably played horribly.

    i like playing in music stores, i like playing in schools, i've played in prisons, on the street, in churchs and it's all cool.

    i just say this is music that came OUT OF THE BROTHELS, out of the bars, funerals out of fields. it was created by slaves and blacks and we can't forget it. the blues are dirty. and i like it that way. music is art and art reflects culture. and jazz is about a lot of things including the 'dark' side.

    i think on the contrary there is a lot of great music that happens in bars, around alcohol.

    i complained about the same stuff you're talking about so i'm in full agreement. however playing in a sleazy bar is really cool. but that's my personal thing. i really appreciate the 'dark' side. and i think you really can't get to the dark side by playing in an elementary school. but there are other benefits to that.

    and yes noisy ignorant people are a drag! i hate it it makes me sick. and ignorant people are everywhere, in bars in schools, churches!!!! however ignorant drunk people are worse than ignorant sober people!!!

    11:59 PM

    By Blogger Tony, at 7:12 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home